
TradingView is great for one strategy at a time. StratCraft is built for something fundamentally different: institutional-grade signal scale.
StratCraft and TradingView solve different problems for different users.
| Feature | TradingView | StratCraft |
|---|---|---|
| Strategies managed simultaneously | 1 | Up to 2,000 |
| Strategy creation | Manual Pine Script | AI-generated + manual |
| Backtesting speed | Cloud, queued | Local C++23, 500-1000x faster than Python |
| Data privacy | Cloud | 100% local, your machine |
| Backtest cost | Credits consumed | Unlimited, no cost per run |
| LLM integration | None | 7 providers natively |
| Portfolio composition | Basic | IC/ICIR/Sharpe statistical methods |
| Plugin ecosystem | Limited indicators | CCXT, FrankWolfe, open architecture |
| MCP / AI agent interface | No | Yes |
| Open source | No | Yes (core) |
| Target user | Individual traders | Quant researchers, systematic traders |
TradingView excels at what it is designed for. Here is when you should choose it.
StratCraft is built for systematic quant research at scale.
Join quant researchers and systematic traders who chose scale over simplicity.